The Day My Calculator Broke and Changed Everything: Problem Solving in the Workplace Examples That Actually Matter

Related Reading:

• Training Core Blog
• Growth Cycle Posts
• Skill Network Resources
• Learning Zone Advice
• Training Flow Insights

Right, so there I was, quarter past nine on a Melbourne Monday morning, staring at a broken calculator and a pile of invoices that needed processing by ten-thirty. The battery had died. No backup calculator in sight. The computer system was down for maintenance until eleven.

And that's when I learnt the most valuable lesson about workplace problem solving that fifteen years in business consulting couldn't teach me.

Real problem solving isn't about following some fancy framework you learnt in a workshop. It's about thinking like your grandmother would've when the power went out during Christmas dinner. You find another way, you make do, and you get creative with what's actually available.

The Problem With Problem Solving "Solutions"

Here's what nobody wants to admit: most workplace problem solving training is absolute rubbish. There, I said it.

Companies spend thousands sending their teams to problem solving and decision making workshops, hoping they'll come back transformed into creative geniuses who can fix anything. What actually happens? They learn five steps, memorise some acronyms, and then freeze up the moment something real goes wrong.

I've seen it happen dozens of times. A manager gets trained in the "proper" problem solving methodology, and suddenly they can't make a simple decision without consulting their flowchart. Meanwhile, the bloke from the warehouse who left school at sixteen is quietly fixing machinery with spare parts and cable ties.

The disconnect is staggering.

What Actually Works: Three Examples From Real Australian Workplaces

Example One: The Freight Company Crisis

A freight company in Brisbane had a nightmare scenario last year. Their main sorting facility flooded during those heavy rains we had. Hundreds of packages sitting in ankle-deep water, Christmas deliveries at risk, customers going mental on social media.

The operations manager didn't call a meeting to discuss root cause analysis. He didn't break out the fishbone diagrams.

He rang every school in a twenty-kilometre radius and hired their gymnasiums for the week. Within six hours, they had temporary sorting facilities running across eight locations. Staff worked in teams, packages got sorted by postcode, and deliveries continued with only a twelve-hour delay.

Was it elegant? No. Did it follow best practice guidelines? Definitely not. Did it solve the problem and save Christmas for thousands of families? Absolutely.

Example Two: The Restaurant Revelation

Small Italian place in Fremantle was bleeding money. Food was brilliant, service was excellent, but they couldn't figure out why customers weren't coming back. The owner tried everything - new menus, discount nights, social media campaigns. Nothing worked.

Then one of the waitresses mentioned something during a staff meeting: "You know how we always run out of parking spaces around dinner time?"

Turned out customers were circling the block for fifteen minutes, getting frustrated, and going elsewhere. The "customer retention problem" was actually a logistics problem.

Solution? They partnered with the office building next door to use their car park after 6 PM. Customer numbers doubled within a month. The fix cost them fifty dollars a week and solved a problem that was costing them thousands.

Sometimes the answer is right there, hiding behind the wrong question.

Example Three: The Manufacturing Mix-Up

Electronics manufacturer in Adelaide discovered they were getting 23% more warranty returns on products manufactured on Thursdays. Quality control went into overdrive, testing everything, checking suppliers, reviewing processes.

Waste of time.

The real problem? The Thursday shift supervisor was colour-blind and couldn't distinguish between the green and amber warning lights on one of the machines. He'd been approving products that should've been flagged for additional testing.

Nobody thought to ask about it because he'd been doing the job for eight years without issues. Turned out he'd developed workarounds for everything else but this one machine was newer and had different light positioning.

Cost to fix: $200 for additional LED indicators with different shapes. Time to identify: six months of investigations and thousands in consultant fees.

Why Traditional Problem Solving Training Fails

The issue with most professional problem solving courses isn't that they're wrong exactly. The frameworks work fine in controlled environments with clear parameters. But real workplace problems are messy, emotional, and rarely fit neat categories.

Traditional training teaches you to:

• Define the problem clearly
• Gather all relevant information
• Generate multiple solutions
• Evaluate options systematically
• Implement the best solution
• Monitor results

Sounds logical, right? But here's what actually happens when the coffee machine breaks during a board meeting and your CEO is having caffeine withdrawal symptoms while trying to negotiate a million-dollar deal.

You don't "define the problem clearly." You grab your car keys, drive to the nearest café, buy six large coffees, and deal with the machine later.

Sometimes the best solution is the obvious one that everyone's too polite or too "professional" to suggest.

The Art of Productive Laziness

One of my favourite problem solving techniques is what I call "productive laziness." Instead of working harder to solve a problem, you work out how to make the problem solve itself.

A Perth accounting firm was drowning in expense claim processing. Staff were spending hours each week sorting receipts, checking calculations, chasing approvals. The obvious solution was to hire more admin staff or invest in expensive software.

The lazy solution? They changed their expense policy. Instead of requiring receipts for everything under $50, they gave everyone a monthly discretionary allowance of $200. No receipts required. No processing needed. Just a flat allowance they could spend however they wanted for business expenses.

Paperwork reduced by 70%. Processing time cut from hours to minutes. Employee satisfaction improved because they could buy lunch without keeping receipts.

Total cost to implement: zero. Actually saved them money.

When Small Business Thinking Beats Corporate Consulting

This is where small business training approaches often outshine their corporate counterparts. Small business owners can't afford to overthink problems. They need solutions that work today, with the resources they have today.

Corporate problem solving often assumes unlimited time and budget for implementation. Small business problem solving assumes you need to fix it before lunch using whatever's in the supply cupboard.

Guess which approach actually gets problems solved?

I worked with a family-owned manufacturing business that had persistent quality issues with one product line. The corporate solution would've involved Six Sigma consultants, statistical analysis, and a twelve-month improvement project.

The family business solution? The owner's daughter, fresh out of uni, spent two days on the factory floor and noticed that workers were skipping a crucial step because the instruction sheet was posted too high on the wall for shorter employees to read comfortably.

Fixed it with a $3 laminated sheet at eye level. Problem disappeared overnight.

The Human Element That Everyone Ignores

Here's something that drives me up the wall about problem solving training: it treats problems like mathematical equations instead of human challenges.

Most workplace problems aren't really about processes or systems. They're about people being tired, confused, overwhelmed, or simply not understanding what's expected of them.

The loading dock that's always running behind schedule might not need better logistics software. It might need a supervisor who actually talks to the drivers instead of hiding in the office all day.

The customer service team with terrible satisfaction scores might not need communication training. They might need the authority to actually solve customer problems instead of escalating everything to management.

The sales team that's not hitting targets might not need better leads or different incentives. They might need someone to acknowledge that the new CRM system is absolute garbage and find something that actually works.

But we keep throwing technical solutions at human problems and wondering why nothing improves.

The Five-Minute Rule That Changes Everything

Want to know the one problem solving technique that actually works in the real world? The five-minute rule.

When something goes wrong, before you do anything else, spend exactly five minutes asking these questions:

1. Who's actually affected by this problem?
2. What's the simplest possible fix?
3. What would happen if we just ignored it completely?
4. Who's dealt with something similar before?
5. What assumptions are we making that might be wrong?

That's it. No complex frameworks, no root cause analysis trees, no stakeholder mapping exercises.

Just five minutes of honest thinking before you start "solving."

You'd be amazed how often the answer becomes obvious once you ask the right questions.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Best Practices

Most "best practice" problem solving approaches are designed to cover corporate backsides, not actually fix problems.

When something goes wrong in a large organisation, the primary concern isn't finding the fastest solution. It's making sure that when the review committee meets next month, you can demonstrate that you followed proper procedures.

Hence the endless documentation, the committee meetings, the stakeholder consultations, the pilot programs, and the phased implementations.

Meanwhile, the problem continues causing damage every single day while you're busy following the approved methodology.

Sometimes the best solution is to ignore best practice completely and just fix the bloody thing.

The Future of Workplace Problem Solving

The companies that will thrive in the coming years aren't the ones with the most sophisticated problem solving frameworks. They're the ones that can adapt fastest when things go wrong.

That means building cultures where people feel safe to suggest simple solutions, where "that's not how we do things" isn't an acceptable response to new ideas, and where solving the customer's problem matters more than following internal procedures.

It means hiring people who can think on their feet, not just people who can follow instructions.

And it means recognising that sometimes the best solution comes from the person who's been quietly dealing with the problem every day, not the consultant who's been brought in to "optimise the process."

What This Means for You

If you're in a position to influence how your organisation approaches problems, consider this: the next time something goes wrong, resist the urge to form a committee.

Instead, find the three people who are most directly affected by the problem. Give them an hour to come up with solutions. Implement the simplest one that might work.

If it doesn't work, try the next simplest option.

Keep going until you find something that actually fixes the issue, not something that follows the approved methodology.

Your customers won't care whether you solved their problem using best practice approaches. They'll care that you solved it quickly and effectively.

That's the kind of problem solving that actually matters in the real world.

And sometimes, when your calculator breaks and you need to process invoices, the solution is as simple as using your phone's calculator app while ordering a new battery online.

The best workplace problems are solved by people who focus on outcomes rather than processes. Everything else is just expensive ways to avoid making decisions.